ACT of 1902 . . . CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) The Trump Card
Enacted by the Congress Further Asserting the Second Amendment as Untouchable
Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of
June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides
the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth
known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia
, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses
every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the
unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right
to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of
attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation
of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United
States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the
National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for
limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the
Union ; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only
purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the
National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits
of the United States ." The
Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4,
1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized
Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly
unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.
the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill
authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45
to invade enemy territory, Canada . The bill was defeated in the House by
Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the
militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the
regular army and send them out of the country.
fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any
circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of
the USA , and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today,
we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the
legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.
Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is
contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10,
1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: "The militia, within the meaning of
these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United
States ." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel
Webster, "that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject
is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General
Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of
the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy
than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it."
limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes
the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power
to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if
the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it
would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for
that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to
be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft
the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict
with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section
and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been
imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power."
Honorable William Gordon
Record, House, Page 640 - 1917
Confirmed on snopes.com - http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/blairholt.asp
HR45 Gun Owners Watch Out
the Blair-Holt proposed legislation: Senate
Bill SB-2099 will require us to put on our
2009 1040 federal tax form all guns that you
have or own. It may require fingerprints and
a tax of $50 per gun.
November, our president promised he was not
going after our Second Amendment rights.
This bill was introduced on Feb. 24. This
bill will become public knowledge 30 days
after it is voted into law. This is an
amendment to the Internal Revenue Act of
1986. This means that the Finance Committee
can pass this without the Senate voting on
it at all. The full text of the proposed
amendment is on the U.S. Senate homepage, http://www.senate.gov/ <http://www.senate.gov//>
> You can find the bill by doing a
search by the bill number, SB-2099.
know who to call; I strongly suggest you do.
Please send a copy of this e-mail to every
gun owner you know.
is now starting on the firearms confiscation
bill. If it passes, gun owners will become
criminals if you don't fully comply. It has
started. Very Important for you to be aware
of a new bill HR 45 introduced into the
House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm
Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009.
Even gun shop owners didn't know about this
because the government is trying to
fly it under the radar. To find out
about this - go to any government website
and type in HR 45or Google HR 45 Blair Holt
Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act
of 2009. You will get all the information.
this would make it illegal to own a firearm
- any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol
unless: It is registered -You are
fingerprinted -You supply a current Driver's
License -You supply your Social Security #
-You will submit to a physical & mental
evaluation at any time of their choosing -
Each update change of ownership through
private or public sale must be reported and
costs $25 - Failure to do so you
automatically lose the right to own a
firearm and are subject up to a year in
jail. - There is a child provision clause on
page 16 section 305 stating a child-access
provision. Gun must be locked and
inaccessible to any child under 18. They
would have the right to come and inspect
that you are storing your gun safely away
from accessibility to children and fine is
punishable for up to 5 yrs. in prison.
you think this is a joke - go to the website
and take your pick of many options to read
this. It is long and lengthy. But,
more and more people are becoming aware of
this. Pass the word along. Any hunters in
your family pass this along.
is just a "termite" approach to
complete confiscation of guns and disarming
of our society to the point we have no
defense - chip away a little here and there
until the goal is accomplished before anyone
is one to act on whether you own a gun or
not. If you take my gun, only the criminal
will have one to use against me. HR 45 only
makes me/us less safe.
Please.. copy and send this out to EVERYONE
in the USA , whether you support the Right
to Bear Arms or not. YOUR rights are next.
Government is taking away our right to
choose, as well as the right to defend
ourselves from intruders.